Totals
- Total revenue
- $2,263,618
- Total expenses
- $1,667,224
- Contributions and grants received
- $2,163,625
- Grants paid
- $0
- Program service revenue
- $42,566
- Investment income
- $27
- Other revenue
- $57,400
- Total assets, end of year
- $1,889,660
- Total liabilities, end of year
- $516,489
- Net assets or fund balances, end of year
- $1,373,171
- Program services expenses (Part IX)
- $1,559,418
- Management and general expenses
- $74,661
- Fundraising expenses
- $33,145
- Program service expenses (Part III)
- $1,559,418
Program services were 93.5% of total expenses calculated — Part IX's program-services column over total expenses, both as filed.
Line items
Every line the filer filed in Parts VIII, IX and X, as filed and in filed order. Blank columns are left out, and the lines are not forced to add up to the totals above.
Revenue
Part VIII, the statement of revenue.
-
1a · Federated campaigns
$0
-
1b · Membership dues
$0
-
1c · Fundraising events
$0
-
1d · Related organizations
$0
-
1e · Government grants (contributions)
$962,880
-
1f · All other contributions, gifts and grants
$1,200,745
-
1g · Noncash contributions included above
$57,400
-
2a · Program service revenue: Client Donations
total $42,566 · related or exempt $42,566 · unrelated business $0 · excluded $0
-
2f · All other program service revenue
total $0 · related or exempt $0 · unrelated business $0 · excluded $0
-
3 · Investment income
total $27 · related or exempt $27 · unrelated business $0 · excluded $0
-
4 · Income from investment of tax-exempt bond proceeds
total $0 · related or exempt $0 · unrelated business $0 · excluded $0
-
5 · Royalties
total $0 · related or exempt $0 · unrelated business $0 · excluded $0
-
6c · Rental income or loss
real property $0 · personal property $0
-
7c · Gain or loss
securities $0 · other assets $0
-
8a · Fundraising events: contributions included on line 1c
$0
-
11a · Other revenue: in-kind professional services
total $57,400 · related or exempt $57,400 · unrelated business $0 · excluded $0
-
11d · All other revenue
total $0 · related or exempt $0 · unrelated business $0 · excluded $0
-
11e · Other revenue, total
$57,400
Functional expenses
Part IX, the statement of functional expenses.
-
5 · Compensation of officers, directors and key employees
total $102,625 · program services $41,040 · management and general $45,162 · fundraising $16,423
-
6 · Compensation of disqualified persons
total $0
-
7 · Other salaries and wages
total $917,647 · program services $917,647 · management and general $0 · fundraising $0
-
8 · Pension plan contributions
total $39,927 · program services $37,531 · management and general $1,757 · fundraising $639
-
9 · Other employee benefits
total $145,084 · program services $136,379 · management and general $6,384 · fundraising $2,321
-
10 · Payroll taxes
total $84,952 · program services $79,855 · management and general $3,738 · fundraising $1,359
-
11b · Fees: legal
total $208,485 · program services $208,485
-
11c · Fees: accounting
total $11,447 · management and general $11,447
-
11d · Fees: lobbying
total $2,000 · program services $2,000
-
12 · Advertising and promotion
total $10,289 · fundraising $10,289
-
13 · Office expenses
total $21,988 · program services $20,669 · management and general $967 · fundraising $352
-
14 · Information technology
total $16,250 · program services $15,275 · management and general $715 · fundraising $260
-
16 · Occupancy
total $91,305 · program services $86,153 · management and general $3,778 · fundraising $1,374
-
17 · Travel
total $7,982 · program services $7,503 · management and general $351 · fundraising $128
-
23 · Insurance
total $7,243 · program services $6,881 · management and general $362 · fundraising $0
Balance sheet
Part X, book values.
-
1 · Cash, non-interest-bearing
beginning of year $40,547 · end of year $64,271
-
2 · Savings and temporary cash investments
beginning of year $288,032 · end of year $263,089
-
3 · Pledges and grants receivable
beginning of year $541,021 · end of year $1,144,831
-
9 · Prepaid expenses and deferred charges
beginning of year $16,898 · end of year $16,944
-
10a · Land, buildings and equipment: cost or other basis
$400,525
-
10b · Land, buildings and equipment: accumulated depreciation
$0
-
10c · Land, buildings and equipment, net
beginning of year $121,141 · end of year $400,525
-
17 · Accounts payable and accrued expenses
beginning of year $177,897 · end of year $158,979
-
25 · Other liabilities
beginning of year $52,965 · end of year $357,510
-
27 · Net assets without donor restrictions
beginning of year $336,777 · end of year $313,171
-
28 · Net assets with donor restrictions
beginning of year $440,000 · end of year $1,060,000
Mission and programs · 2023
Mission
The Unemployment Law Project is a statewide, not-for-profit law firm that is established to provide advice, education, advocacy, services, and representation to unemployed workers, to defend the rights and benefits of workers and unemployed people, to advise workers of their rights, and to help alleviate the burden of Washington State residents experiencing unemployment.
Activities or mission (Part I)
The Unemployment Law Project is a statewide, not-for-profit law firm that is established to provide advice, education, advocacy, services, and representation to unemployed workers, to defend the rights and benefits of workers and unemployed people, to advise workers, and to further Washington State residents in accessing unemployment benefits.
-
The Unemployment Law Project (ULP) provides free legal assistance and information to people who have been denied unemployment benefits. With offices in Seattle and Spokane, Washington, we offer our services to anyone who has or is eligible for a Washington State unemployment claim. Unemployment benefits are a public benefit, in existence since 1935 as part of the Social Security Act, an enacted in Washington State in 1937. Countless studies have demonstrated that unemployment benefits help not only the individual unemployed worker, but also the whole community. Unemployment benefits are paid out to landlords, grocery stores, medical professionals, restaurateurs, etc. The benefits help a worker manage a period of unemployment, staying in their home and continuing to have food and medicine while temporarily without work. Empirical studies have demonstrated that a person who has representation at a benefits hearing is more likely to succeed in winning benefits than someone who is not represented. -----In 2022 Unemployment Law Project staff, students, and volunteer attorneys provided representation in 1211 hearings. During this period 685 cases were screened and referred to the Office of Civil Legal Aid attorney panel. Another 779 persons were advised. The demand for services remains high as we receive hundreds of calls each week in Seattle and Spokane. The Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) has about 30,000 upcoming hearings.----- The Seattle office has focused on outreach to immigrant communities with Outreach Coordinator Ahmed Abdi. In 2023 ULP represented 914 clients in hearings and appeals. We advised and referred 841 others. The OCLA referral panel ended mid 2023. Ten OCLA panel attorneys provided 1,502 hours of hearing representation in 2023 in 194 hearings. ULP in Seattle and Spokane continued to prioritize outreach in marginalized communities. Some of the activities are listed below. ULP also connected with labor unions for outreach and referrals. ULP won an important legislative victory in Olympia with the passage of ESHB 1106. Policy Director Anne Paxton worked with Rep. Liz Berry, Sen. Rebecca Saldana, Rep. Mary Fosse, and Sen. Karen Keiser to get the bill passed. Under the new law, family caregivers will not be denied unemployment benefits for a caregiving inaccessibility, whether it involves care of children, elderly parents or other family members. ULP worked with Moms Rising and the United Labor Lobby in getting the bill passed. Spokane Managing Attorney Juliana Repp applied for and was awarded an Accelerator Grant for a Domestic Violence outreach grant for the Native community. The $60,000 grant will include two student fellows and will commence in 2024. BECU awarded ULP a $15,000 "People Helping People" grant. ULP also participated in advocacy for policy changes at ESD that will impact thousands of claimants in a positive way. For many years unemployment claimants have been asked questions about searching for work at their hearing about their job separation. This was an unnecessary waste of time and led to confusion and unfair denials of benefits. Those questions are not being asked at current hearings. ULP participated in advocacy for this change. ESD adopted new standards to open up rules for pandemic era overpayments. The new policy includes a broader interpretation of "equity and good conscience". and will mean that more people will be able to get overpayment waivers. ULP participated in advocacy for this change.Example Case One* A man who identified as gay quit his job as a sale associate at an auto dealership in Spokane. He was subjected to threatening homophobic treatment and unfair sales practices inflicted on him by the management team. The management team prevented him for receiving full credit for his sales, gave his deals to other sales personnel, and prevented him from getting sales. He was also subjected to anti-LGBTQ slurs and mocked because of his sexual orientation. He asked the perpetrators to stop their demeaning behavior and he reported it to the General Manager of the store. None of these efforts to stop the harrassment were fruitful and the harassment continued. He called the corporate hotline to report these instances and received no response. He ultimately quit his position due to the intolerable hostile work environment. ESD denied benefits reasoning that he quit because he "was not satisified with his job." The claimant filed an appeal. ULP represented him at his hearing and the judge ruled in his favor due to the illegal work environment. Benefits were granted. Case Two* A medical courier in Vancouver developed epilepsy thatimpacted his ability to continue to drive to work. He was briefly given a front desk role at the medical clinic that he worked for, but the epilepsy unfortunately led to a loss of voice and he was no longer able to speak. Still eager to work he applied for training benefits from ESD so that he could learn medical information technology and continue working in his field. ESD denied his application because they determined that he was not a dislocated worker because he was not laid off from his job and that his previous occupation was in demand. ULP represented him at this hearing and requested accomodation for the hearing because a regular telephone hearing would be impossible.The hearing office allowed the claimant to type his answers. Similar accommodations were made by ULP in preparation for the hearing. The judge was patient with the process and ruled that the claimant was a dislocated worker due to his disability and that he quaified for the training benefits even though his prior occupation was in demand. Case Three* A Korean American medical assistant who worked in Snohomish County filed for unemployment benefits after she lost her employment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Soon after, she was able to secure another job and she stopped claiming for unemployment. ESD then decided to issue a denial and assessed an overpayment. The claimant never received the overpayment letter, but filed the appeal as soon as she received an invoice for repayment. The appeal was filed a few days late. ULP represented her at her hearing and the judge found that there was no good cause for the late appeal. He ruled that she was unable to rebut the presumption that the overpayment letter was received. The Commissioner's Review Office affirmed the decision of the hearing judge. ULP took this case to the Court of Appeals. The court found that there was good cause for the late appeal and remanded the matter for a hearing on the merits. At the new hearing she was represented by ULP. The judge ruled in her favor and removed the $10,000 overpayment.
Expenses $1,559,418 · Revenue $42,565
As filed on the 2023 return.
Listed in Part VII
-
John Tirpak
Executive Director
- Total calculated
- $100,125
- From this org
- $100,125
- From related orgs
- $0
- Other
- $0
- Hours/week
- 40
-
Jennifer Murray
Vice President
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
-
Andrez Munoz
Board Member
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
-
Jennifer Yogi
Board Member
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
-
Eric Gonzalez
Secretary
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
-
Lillian Kaide
Board Member
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
-
Jenee Jahn
Treasurer
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
-
Joseph Shaeffer
President
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
-
Erin Pettigrew
Board Member
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
Compensation is as filed in Part VII: reportable pay from this organization and from related organizations, other compensation, and hours per week. The total, marked calculated, is our sum of the three dollar columns, with a blank column counted as $0; the form itself has no total. On a Form 990-EZ the columns are Part IV's instead, and on a Form 990-PF Part VIII's — compensation, contributions to benefit plans, and expense account — and the total sums those.
Grants on this return
No itemized grants to organizations on this return.
Provenance
- Return type
- form_990
- Tax year
- 2023
- Filed
- 13 November 2024
- IRS schema version
- 2023v5.0
- Source object
- 202423199349316872
Check it against the return as filed: the GivingTuesday Data Lake hosts a public copy of the original XML.
The source document this was parsed from is served over the API, which is where bulk and document access live.