Totals
- Total revenue
- $9,509,051
- Total expenses
- $10,185,016
- Contributions and grants received
- $8,740,168
- Grants paid
- $0
- Program service revenue
- $745,204
- Investment income
- $18,359
- Other revenue
- $5,320
- Total assets, end of year
- $4,462,056
- Total liabilities, end of year
- $1,936,116
- Net assets or fund balances, end of year
- $2,525,940
- Program services expenses (Part IX)
- $8,025,651
- Management and general expenses
- $2,159,365
- Fundraising expenses
- $0
- Program service expenses (Part III)
- $8,025,651
Program services were 78.8% of total expenses calculated — Part IX's program-services column over total expenses, both as filed.
Line items
Every line the filer filed in Parts VIII, IX and X, as filed and in filed order. Blank columns are left out, and the lines are not forced to add up to the totals above.
Revenue
Part VIII, the statement of revenue.
-
1e · Government grants (contributions)
$7,467,373
-
1f · All other contributions, gifts and grants
$1,272,795
-
2a · Program service revenue: CONTRACT REVENUE
total $745,204 · related or exempt $745,204
-
3 · Investment income
total $18,359 · excluded $18,359
-
11a · Other revenue: MISCELLANEOUS INCOME
total $5,320 · related or exempt $5,320
-
11e · Other revenue, total
$5,320
Functional expenses
Part IX, the statement of functional expenses.
-
5 · Compensation of officers, directors and key employees
total $540,222 · program services $187,753 · management and general $352,469
-
7 · Other salaries and wages
total $4,326,396 · program services $3,374,355 · management and general $952,041
-
8 · Pension plan contributions
total $436,074 · program services $436,074
-
9 · Other employee benefits
total $614,873 · program services $232,900 · management and general $381,973
-
10 · Payroll taxes
total $356,657 · program services $356,657
-
11b · Fees: legal
total $578 · management and general $578
-
11c · Fees: accounting
total $43,820 · management and general $43,820
-
11g · Fees: other
total $897,301 · program services $830,926 · management and general $66,375
-
13 · Office expenses
total $59,669 · program services $35,770 · management and general $23,899
-
14 · Information technology
total $528,314 · program services $390,059 · management and general $138,255
-
16 · Occupancy
total $285,545 · program services $209,412 · management and general $76,133
-
17 · Travel
total $117,694 · program services $79,509 · management and general $38,185
-
19 · Conferences, conventions and meetings
total $64,403 · program services $7,917 · management and general $56,486
-
23 · Insurance
total $23,667 · management and general $23,667
-
24a · Other expenses: SUBCONTRACTORS
total $1,738,810 · program services $1,738,810
-
24b · Other expenses: PARTICIPANT SUPPORT
total $111,827 · program services $111,827
-
24c · Other expenses: MISCELLANEOUS
total $33,917 · program services $31,055 · management and general $2,862
-
24d · Other expenses: DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS
total $5,249 · program services $2,627 · management and general $2,622
Balance sheet
Part X, book values.
-
1 · Cash, non-interest-bearing
beginning of year $361
-
2 · Savings and temporary cash investments
beginning of year $3,127,478 · end of year $2,514,168
-
4 · Accounts receivable
beginning of year $1,257,019 · end of year $1,298,843
-
9 · Prepaid expenses and deferred charges
beginning of year $50,569 · end of year $65,138
-
10a · Land, buildings and equipment: cost or other basis
$0
-
10c · Land, buildings and equipment, net
beginning of year $0
-
15 · Other assets
beginning of year $38,544 · end of year $583,907
-
17 · Accounts payable and accrued expenses
beginning of year $831,283 · end of year $941,564
-
25 · Other liabilities
beginning of year $440,783 · end of year $994,552
-
27 · Net assets without donor restrictions
beginning of year $1,163,150 · end of year $1,155,150
-
28 · Net assets with donor restrictions
beginning of year $2,038,755 · end of year $1,370,790
Mission and programs · 2022
Mission
THE CONCORD CONSORTIUM IS A RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION DEDICATED TO TRANSFORMING EDUCATION THROUGH TECHNOLOGY...(CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O)
Activities or mission (Part I)
TO IGNITE LARGE-SCALE IMPROVEMENTS IN TEACHING AND LEARNING THROUGH TECHNOLOGY.
-
DATA SCIENCE LEARNING EXPERIENCES FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL-AGED GIRLS IN INFORMAL GAMING CLUBS FY2023THE PRIMARY GOAL OF THE PROJECT IS TO DESIGN AND INVESTIGATE INFORMAL, GAME-BASED DATA SCIENCE LEARNING EXPERIENCES FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL-AGED GIRLS AND GENDER-EXPANSIVE YOUTH THAT PROMOTE LEARNING AND INTEREST IN DATA SCIENCE. THIS PROJECT IS A COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE CONCORD CONSORTIUM, THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI, AND FABLEVISION GAMES. TOGETHER, WE ARE DESIGNING AND DEVELOPING A MULTIPLAYER, DATA-RICH VIRTUAL WORLD AND RESEARCHING HOW IT SUPPORTS MIDDLE SCHOOL GIRLS' ENGAGEMENT WITH DATA AND PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR FIT WITH DATA AND DATA-RICH FUTURES.MAJOR ACTIVITIES IN THE FIRST YEAR FOCUSED ON CO-DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE "THE ISLES OF ILKMAAR" GAME. THIS INVOLVED CREATING THE GAME NARRATIVE, ART ASSETS, PLAYABLE PROTOTYPES, DATA SYSTEMS, AND LEARNING DESIGN DOCUMENTS. THE DESIGN WORK WAS AN ITERATIVE PROCESS INCORPORATING FEEDBACK FROM THE TARGET AUDIENCE, EDUCATION RESEARCHERS, AND GAME DEVELOPERS.CO-DESIGN RESEARCH WAS ALSO CONDUCTED BY RECRUITING PARTICIPANTS, DEVELOPING RESEARCH PROTOCOLS AND INSTRUMENTS, ANALYZING DATA TO INFORM DESIGN, AND PREPARING FINDINGS FOR ACADEMIC CONFERENCES. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVED INCLUDE: GAME NARRATIVE, ART, PROTOTYPES, DATA SYSTEM, AND LEARNING DESIGN DOCUMENTS CREATED THROUGH COLLABORATION BETWEEN DEVELOPERS, RESEARCHERS, AND USERS. IRB EXEMPTIONS RECEIVED FOR STUDIES ON PARTICIPATORY DESIGN AND GAMING CLUBS. ONLINE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM ESTABLISHED AND SURVEYS CONDUCTED, PROVIDING FEEDBACK AND INPUT FROM OVER 300 RESPONDENTS. INTERVIEWS AND PLAYTESTS WITH TARGET AUDIENCE CONDUCTED, TOTALING OVER 25 SESSIONS, AND DATA COLLECTED FROM SURVEYS AND INTERVIEWS ANALYZED. WROTE REPORTS ON THE DESIGN PROCESS AND RESEARCH FINDINGS, AND SUBMITTED ARTICLES TO VARIOUS CONFERENCES, INCLUDING ICLS, CSCL, SEEDS, AND AERA. AN ARTICLE DETAILING THE PROJECT AND ITS FINDINGS HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN THE @CONCORD NEWSLETTER, CONTRIBUTING TO THE DISSEMINATION OF OUR WORK TO A BROADER AUDIENCE.IN SUMMARY, THE PROJECT HAS MADE SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS IN THE COLLABORATIVE DESIGN OF A GAME-BASED DATA SCIENCE LEARNING EXPERIENCE, CONDUCTED RESEARCH TO INFORM THE DESIGN, AND DISSEMINATED FINDINGS, ACHIEVING ITS GOALS THUS FAR. KEY OUTCOMES INCLUDE PLAYABLE GAME VERSIONS, RESEARCH FINDINGS, AND DESIGN DOCUMENTATION THAT WILL INFORM FUTURE PROJECT PHASES.
Expenses $783,527
-
PRECIPITATING CHANGE WITH ALASKAN AND HAWAIIAN SCHOOLS: BRIDGING INDIGENOUS AND WESTERN SCIENCE WHILE MITIGATING COASTAL EROSION PROJECT FY2023 THE PRECIPITATING CHANGE WITH ALASKAN AND HAWAIIAN SCHOOLS PROJECT (HTTPS://CONCORD.ORG/PRECIPITATING-CHANGE-ALASKA-HAWAII/) AT THE CONCORD CONSORTIUM IS A MULTI-YEAR COLLABORATION WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA; UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I, MANOA; THE UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA AT ANCHORAGE INCLUDING THE APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER (UAA-AERC); AND PARTNER MIDDLE SCHOOLS IN ALASKA AND HAWAI'I. THE PROJECT GOAL IS TO DESIGN AND TEST INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES TO PROMOTE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS' CAPACITY TO BRIDGE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND WESTERN SCIENCE THROUGH A MULTI-PERSPECTIVE INSTRUCTIONAL APPROACH THAT INCLUDES AND VALUES INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE AND CULTURE, AND ENGAGES STUDENTS WITH WESTERN SCIENCE WITHOUT ASKING THEM TO ABANDON OR DEVALUE THEIR HOME CULTURE PERSPECTIVE. THE PROJECT AIMS TO PROMOTE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS' ABILITY TO APPLY INTEGRATED EARTH SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND COMPUTATIONAL THINKING SKILLS IN THE CONTEXT OF COASTAL EROSION. THE INSTRUCTIONAL UNIT IS DESIGNED WITH UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNING (UDL) PRINCIPLES, INCLUDING A MULTIPLE-REPRESENTATION GLOSSARY, TRANSLATIONS FOR INDIGENOUS LANGUAGES, AND SCAFFOLDING TO ASSIST STUDENTS IN UNDERSTANDING INDIGENOUS AND WESTERN SCIENCE TERMS. THE PRECIPITATING CHANGE: COASTAL EROSION INSTRUCTIONAL UNIT TARGETS THREE MAIN NGSS STANDARDS.INSTRUCTIONAL UNIT. CONSISTENT WITH A DESIGN-BASED IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH APPROACH, UNIT DESIGN AND INSTRUCTION REFLECT COLLABORATION AMONG PARTNERS REPRESENTING DIVERSE AREAS OF EXPERTISE INCLUDING INDIGENOUS AND WESTERN SCIENCE, AND SCIENCE EDUCATION RESEARCH, DESIGN, AND PRACTICE. UNIT DESIGN AND INSTRUCTION ALSO REFLECT INTEGRATION AND ITERATIVE REFINEMENT OF MULTIPLE INSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTS. IN THE FIVE-WEEK COASTAL EROSION UNIT, THESE ELEMENTS ARE INFUSED AND ORGANIZED INTO THE CREATIVE PROCESS INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL SEQUENCE. THERE IS A FOCUS ON STORIES, LEARNING WITH ELDERS, COMMUNITY PRACTICES AND ARTS FOR INDIGENOUS WAYS OF KNOWING THROUGHOUT THE LESSONS. WORKING WITH ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS AT UAA-AERC, WE CREATED COASTAL EROSION SCENARIOS FOR STUDENTS TO ENGAGE WITH USING HISTORICAL DATA. THUS, USING BOTH EMBEDDED PHENOMENA AND COMPUTATIONAL MODELS, STUDENTS EXPERIENCE EROSION EVENTS EVOLVING IN THE SAME WAY THAT THE ACTUAL EVENTS EVOLVED THROUGH INTERACTIONS AMONG VARIABLES SUCH AS SEA LEVEL, WAVE HEIGHT, SUBSTRATE MATERIAL, VEGETATION, PRECIPITATION, AND WIND SPEED. USING A VARIETY OF METHODS THAT BUILD FLEXIBILITY AND CAN BE ADJUSTED FOR EVERY STUDENT'S STRENGTHS AND NEEDS, UDL PROVIDES ALL STUDENTS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO SUCCEED THROUGHOUT THE CURRICULUM. UDL FEATURES PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY IN INFORMATION PRESENTATION AND REDUCE BARRIERS IN INSTRUCTION. A KEY UDL PROJECT FEATURE IN THE COASTAL EROSION UNIT IS A MULTI-REPRESENTATIONAL GLOSSARY WHERE STUDENTS CAN VIEW INDIGENOUS AND WESTERN SCIENCE TERMS AND SYMBOLS HYPERLINKED, REPRESENTED, AND CONTEXTUALIZED THROUGH PICTURES, DIAGRAMS, AND A SHORT MOVIE. SUCH OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDENTS TO USE THE GLOSSARY TO TOGGLE BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN ENGLISH AND THEIR NATIVE LANGUAGE ARE ESPECIALLY POWERFUL FOR PLACE-BASED AND CULTURALLY CONGRUENT INSTRUCTION WITH INDIGENOUS STUDENTS. TECHNOLOGY AND SOFTWARE. THREE TECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS WERE DEVELOPED FOR THE COASTAL EROSION UNITEMBEDDED PHENOMENA (EP)/ BEACH PROFILE GRAPHER, CLASSROOM WAVE TANK PHYSICAL MODEL, AND NETLOGO COMPUTATIONAL MODELSTO HELP STUDENTS ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: "HOW DOES COASTAL EROSION AFFECT OUR LIVES AND WHAT, IF ANYTHING, SHOULD WE DO ABOUT IT?" DURING THE COASTAL EROSION INVESTIGATIONS STUDENTS STUDY THREE DRIVING QUESTIONS: 1. HAS THE SHORELINE CHANGED IN THE PAST AND IS IT CHANGING NOW? HOW AND WHY?; 2. IF THE SHORELINE KEEPS CHANGING THE WAY IT HAS BEEN, WHAT WILL IT BE LIKE IN THE FUTURE?; AND 3. WHAT COULD OR SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT THE CHANGING SHORELINE?THE EP/ BEACH PROFILE GRAPHER SOFTWARE PROVIDES STUDENTS THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLORE A LARGE COMPLEX DATASET KINESTHETICALLY TO HELP THEM VISUALIZE A BEACH PROFILE USING THE EMERY METHOD. EACH CLASSROOM IS PROVIDED A LARGE WAVE TANK TO INVESTIGATE AND CONDUCT PHYSICAL TESTS OF HOW WATER HEIGHT AND WAVE ACTION IMPACT COASTS. USING THE WAVE TANK MODEL, STUDENTS CAN TEST DIFFERENT MITIGATION TREATMENTS INCLUDING SEAWALLS AND REVETMENTS OF DIFFERENT FORMS, ROCK ARMOR, AND BREAKWATERS TO EXAMINE THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THESE METHODS FOR MITIGATING EROSION. NETLOGO MODELS COMPLEMENT THE EP AND WAVE TANK EXPERIENCES BY PROVIDING STUDENTS WITH A TOOL THAT CAN HELP THEM DEVELOP AND TEST THE RULES THEY BUILD AROUND COASTAL EROSION. STUDENTS USE THIS MODEL TO MAKE SENSE OF LOCAL DATA REPRESENTED IN MAPS AND VISUALIZATIONS THAT EXTEND OVER TIME; IDENTIFY PATTERNS AND RELATIONSHIPS AMONG VARIABLES; AND MAKE PREDICTIONS FOR IMPACTS OF SEA LEVEL RISE, STORM SURGE, AND COASTAL EROSION ON THEIR COMMUNITIES. RESEARCH: RESEARCH ON STUDENT LEARNING IS GUIDED BY THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: DEVELOPING MULTI-PERSPECTIVE LEARNING PROGRESSION FRAMEWORKS: WHAT ARE DIFFERENT WAYS STUDENTS MAKE SENSE OF COASTAL EROSION? HOW DO STUDENTS' WAYS OF MAKING SENSE REFLECT PERSONAL AND CULTURAL (INCLUDING INDIGENOUS) FUNDS OF KNOWLEDGE AS WELL AS WESTERN STEM PERSPECTIVES REFLECTIVE OF NGSS- ALIGNED THREE-DIMENSIONAL SCIENCE KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE? EXAMINING LEARNING: HOW DO CULTURALLY CONGRUENT, MULTI-PERSPECTIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCES THATVALUE BOTH STUDENTS' HOME CULTURE AND WESTERN SCIENCE PERSPECTIVES RELATE TO CHANGES IN STUDENTS' SCIENCE KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICES INTEGRATING COASTAL EROSION AND COMPUTATIONAL THINKING? EXAMINING PREPARATION FOR FUTURE LEARNING: HOW DO MULTI-PERSPECTIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCES INFLUENCE THE APPROACHES TO LEARNING STUDENTS DESCRIBE WHEN THEY ENCOUNTER A NEW SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUE?
Expenses $629,868
-
LEVERAGING DYNAMICALLY LINKED REPRESENTATIONS IN A SEMI-STRUCTURED WORKSPACE TO CULTIVATE MATHEMATICAL MODELING COMPETENCIES AMONG SECONDARY STUDENTS (M2STUDIO) FY2023THE M2STUDIO PROJECT AIMS TO CULTIVATE MATHEMATICAL MODELING COMPETENCIES AMONG SECONDARY STUDENTS THROUGH A PROCESS-ORIENTED PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH POWERED BY A WEB-BASED, INTEGRATED MODELING ENVIRONMENT. UPHOLDING AN EQUITY-CENTERED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGENDA, THE PROJECT IS COLLABORATING WITH SCHOOLS SERVING BLACK, LATINX, AND NATIVE AMERICAN POPULATIONS ACROSS RURAL, URBAN, AND SUBURBAN SETTINGS. TEACHERS AND SCHOOL LEADERS ARE PARTICIPATING AS CO-DESIGNERS IN ALL STAGES OF THE PROJECT, SHAPING THE DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY AND CURRICULUM TO SERVE TEACHER NEEDS AND UNDERREPRESENTED STUDENT POPULATIONS. TECHNOLOGY AND CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENTM2STUDIO PLATFORM: THIS YEAR, WE ENHANCED THE M2STUDIO PLATFORM WITH FEATURES THAT ENABLE INTERACTIVE MATHEMATICAL OPERATIONS AND MODEL VISUALIZATION. THIS DEVELOPMENT PHASE WAS CHARACTERIZED BY FOCUSING ON USER EXPERIENCE, ENSURING THE TOOL IS INTUITIVE AND EFFECTIVE FOR STUDENTS.CURRICULUM MODULE: WE DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED A COMPREHENSIVE 10-HOUR CURRICULUM MODULE FOR ALGEBRA AND STATISTICS. THIS MODULE INCLUDES DETAILED TEACHING GUIDES, ASSESSMENTS, AND INTERACTIVE LEARNING TASKS DESIGNED TO MAXIMIZE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND LEARNING OUTCOMES. THIS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS INVOLVED INTEGRATING INSIGHTS FROM CO-DESIGN TEACHERS, RELEVANT LITERATURE, AND TEAM EXPERIENCE TO CREATE INTERACTIVE AND CONTEXTUALLY RELEVANT LESSONS.ASSESSMENTS: WE ESTABLISHED A ROBUST FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING MATHEMATICAL MODELING COMPETENCIES. THIS ENCOMPASSES A RANGE OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS DESIGNED TO GAUGE STUDENT UNDERSTANDING AND PROGRESS IN A NUANCED AND COMPREHENSIVE MANNER.PARTICIPATORY DESIGN AND ITERATIVE DEVELOPMENT: THE PROJECT EMPHASIZES ACTIVE COLLABORATION WITH TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN ITS DESIGN AND TESTING PHASES. THIS PARTICIPATORY APPROACH ENSURES THAT THE DEVELOPED TOOLS AND CURRICULUM ARE RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS AND CONTEXTS OF THE LEARNING COMMUNITY. WE COMPLETED TECHNOLOGY AND MODULE IMPROVEMENT BASED ON THE EXPERIENCE OF 6 STUDENTS IN A LABORATORY SETTING, THEN PILOTED THE FULL MODULE WITH 10 TEACHERS AND A TOTAL OF 369 HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS FROM OREGON AND NEW YORK. COLLECTED DATA INCLUDE STUDENTS' ARTIFACTS, RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS AND QUIZZES, AND OVER 100 HOURS OF RECORDED VIDEOS (CAMERA RECORDING VIDEOS AND COMPUTER SCREEN RECORDINGS) FOCUSING ON STUDENTS' INTERACTIONS WITH THE M2STUDIO TOOLS AND STUDENTS' ENGAGEMENT IN THE LEARNING ACTIVITIES. THESE RECORDINGS PROVIDED VALUABLE INSIGHTS INTO HOW STUDENTS NAVIGATE AND UTILIZE THE MODELING ENVIRONMENT IN REAL TIME. RESEARCH ACTIVITIESDEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORKS: WE DEVELOPED INNOVATIVE ANALYTICAL TOOLS TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF THE M2STUDIO PLATFORM ON STUDENT LEARNING. THESE TOOLS ARE CRUCIAL FOR UNDERSTANDING THE NUANCES OF TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED LEARNING AND FOR MAKING DATA-DRIVEN DECISIONS TO ENHANCE THE PLATFORM.PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRAININGPOSTDOCTORAL AND DOCTORAL TRAINING: WE ENGAGED WITH POSTDOCTORAL AND DOCTORAL RESEARCHERS, INTEGRATING THEIR EXPERTISE INTO THE CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS. THESE SCHOLARS BRING FRESH PERSPECTIVES AND INNOVATIVE IDEAS TO THE PROJECT.TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING: THIS YEAR, WE OFFERED A 40-HOUR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP FOR TEACHERS. THIS WORKSHOP EQUIPPED EDUCATORS WITH THE NECESSARY SKILLS TO IMPLEMENT THE M2STUDIO CURRICULUM AND PROVIDED A PLATFORM FOR EXCHANGING IDEAS AND BEST PRACTICES.
Expenses $688,445
-
THE CONCORD CONSORTIUM PRODUCED TECHNOLOGY-BASED CURRICULUM MATERIALS FOR SCIENCE, MATH, AND ENGINEERING FOR STUDENTS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THROUGH COLLEGE. OUR MAJOR PROGRAMS PRODUCED DOZENS OF CURRICULAR UNITS AND ACTIVITIES SUPPORTING LEARNING IN PHYSICS, PHYSICAL SCIENCE, EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, CHEMISTRY, BIOLOGY, MATHEMATICS, DATA SCIENCE, AND ENGINEERING. ASIDE FROM OUR MAJOR PROGRAMS, WE GATHERED AND INVESTIGATED RESEARCH DATA FROM 40 ADDITIONAL PROGRAMS THAT INFORM THE DEVELOPMENT AND REFINEMENT OF CURRICULUM MATERIALS, AND BENEFIT OTHER RESEARCHERS AND ORGANIZATIONS DEVELOPING EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY.
Expenses $5,923,811 · Revenue $750,524
As filed on the 2022 return. The filer continues this part on Schedule O, which is not shown here.
Listed in Part VII
-
Chad DorseyCHAD DORSEY
PRESIDENT/CEO
- Total calculated
- $282,974
- From this org
- $232,295
- From related orgs
- $0
- Other
- $50,679
- Hours/week
- 40
Schedule J breakdown matched by us
- Base
- $232,295
- Bonus
- $0
- Other
- $0
- Deferred
- $24,334
- Nontaxable benefits
- $26,345
- Filer's total
- $282,974
-
Lawrence BehanLAWRENCE BEHAN
CFO
- Total calculated
- $212,469
- From this org
- $193,047
- From related orgs
- $0
- Other
- $19,422
- Hours/week
- 40
Schedule J breakdown matched by us
- Base
- $193,047
- Bonus
- $0
- Other
- $0
- Deferred
- $18,612
- Nontaxable benefits
- $810
- Filer's total
- $212,469
-
Leslie BondarykLESLIE BONDARYK
DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY
- Total calculated
- $197,856
- From this org
- $166,423
- From related orgs
- $0
- Other
- $31,433
- Hours/week
- 40
Schedule J breakdown matched by us
- Base
- $166,423
- Bonus
- $0
- Other
- $0
- Deferred
- $16,516
- Nontaxable benefits
- $14,917
- Filer's total
- $197,856
-
Amy PallantAMY PALLANT
SENIOR RESEARCHER
- Total calculated
- $180,540
- From this org
- $139,594
- From related orgs
- $0
- Other
- $40,946
- Hours/week
- 40
Schedule J breakdown matched by us
- Base
- $139,594
- Bonus
- $0
- Other
- $0
- Deferred
- $14,486
- Nontaxable benefits
- $26,460
- Filer's total
- $180,540
-
Carolyn StaudtCAROLYN STAUDT
SENIOR RESEARCHER
- Total calculated
- $170,509
- From this org
- $145,204
- From related orgs
- $0
- Other
- $25,305
- Hours/week
- 40
Schedule J breakdown matched by us
- Base
- $145,204
- Bonus
- $0
- Other
- $0
- Deferred
- $14,518
- Nontaxable benefits
- $10,787
- Filer's total
- $170,509
-
Kirk SwensonKIRK SWENSON
SENIOR PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
- Total calculated
- $158,468
- From this org
- $144,380
- From related orgs
- $0
- Other
- $14,088
- Hours/week
- 40
Schedule J breakdown matched by us
- Base
- $144,380
- Bonus
- $0
- Other
- $0
- Deferred
- $13,278
- Nontaxable benefits
- $810
- Filer's total
- $158,468
-
Cynthia McIntyreCYNTHIA MCINTYRE
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
- Total calculated
- $155,985
- From this org
- $142,499
- From related orgs
- $0
- Other
- $13,486
- Hours/week
- 40
Schedule J breakdown matched by us
- Base
- $142,499
- Bonus
- $0
- Other
- $0
- Deferred
- $12,676
- Nontaxable benefits
- $810
- Filer's total
- $155,985
-
Helen QuinnHELEN QUINN
CHAIR
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
-
Chris ManosCHRIS MANOS
TREASURER
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
-
Lisa BuoncuoreLISA BUONCUORE
CLERK
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 1
-
Kathy HurleyKATHY HURLEY
BOARD MEMBER
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 0.5
-
Kim KastensKIM KASTENS
BOARD MEMBER
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 0.5
-
Paulette AltmaierPAULETTE ALTMAIER
BOARD MEMBER
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 0.5
-
Pamela PelletierPAMELA PELLETIER
BOARD MEMBER
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 0.5
-
Carlos MoralesCARLOS MORALES
BOARD MEMBER
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 0.5
-
Heidi SchweingruberHEIDI SCHWEINGRUBER
BOARD MEMBER
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 0.5
-
Maya GarciaMAYA GARCIA
BOARD MEMBER
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 0.5
-
David Van EsselstynDAVID VAN ESSELSTYN
BOARD MEMBER
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 0.5
-
Thomas PhillipTHOMAS PHILLIP
BOARD MEMBER
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 0.5
-
Carissa LittleCARISSA LITTLE
BOARD MEMBER ( AS OF 01/2023)
- Total calculated
- $0
- Hours/week
- 0.5
Compensation is as filed in Part VII: reportable pay from this organization and from related organizations, other compensation, and hours per week. The total, marked calculated, is our sum of the three dollar columns, with a blank column counted as $0; the form itself has no total. On a Form 990-EZ the columns are Part IV's instead, and on a Form 990-PF Part VIII's — compensation, contributions to benefit plans, and expense account — and the total sums those. A Schedule J breakdown is as filed: base pay, bonus, other, deferred compensation and nontaxable benefits from this organization, with any from related organizations beside each, and the filer's own total. It is shown with the Part VII listing of the same name on the same return. The form gives no key between the two, so that pairing is ours, and is marked matched by us.
Schedule J
Answered yes
- 3 · Approval by the board or compensation committee
Answered no
- 4a · Severance or change-of-control payment
- 4b · Supplemental nonqualified retirement plan
- 4c · Equity-based compensation arrangement
- 5a · Pay contingent on this organization's revenues
- 5b · Pay contingent on a related organization's revenues
- 6a · Pay contingent on this organization's net earnings
- 6b · Pay contingent on a related organization's net earnings
- 7 · Other non-fixed payments
- 8 · Paid under the initial-contract exception
Part I's answers as filed. A line not listed was left unanswered; on lines 1a and 3 that means the box was not checked.
Grants on this return
No itemized grants to organizations on this return.
Provenance
- Return type
- form_990
- Tax year
- 2022
- Filed
- 29 January 2024
- IRS schema version
- 2022v5.0
- Source object
- 202430369349300773
Check it against the return as filed: the GivingTuesday Data Lake hosts a public copy of the original XML.
The source document this was parsed from is served over the API, which is where bulk and document access live.