Skip to content
Nonprofiteer
← INSTITUTE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY

Form 990 for tax year 2022

Filed by INSTITUTE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY.

Totals

Total revenue
$4,269,815
Total expenses
$4,176,214
Contributions and grants received
$4,137,847
Grants paid
$0
Program service revenue
$55,000
Investment income
$70,094
Other revenue
$6,874
Total assets, end of year
$12,747,452
Total liabilities, end of year
$598,195
Net assets or fund balances, end of year
$12,149,257
Program services expenses (Part IX)
$3,124,897
Management and general expenses
$975,500
Fundraising expenses
$75,817
Program service expenses (Part III)
$3,124,897

Program services were 74.8% of total expenses calculated — Part IX's program-services column over total expenses, both as filed.

Line items

Every line the filer filed in Parts VIII, IX and X, as filed and in filed order. Blank columns are left out, and the lines are not forced to add up to the totals above.

Revenue

Part VIII, the statement of revenue.

  • 1f · All other contributions, gifts and grants

    $4,137,847

  • 2a · Program service revenue: PROGRAM SERVICES

    total $55,000 · related or exempt $55,000

  • 3 · Investment income

    total $70,094 · excluded $70,094

  • 11a · Other revenue: MISCELLANEOUS

    total $6,874 · excluded $6,874

  • 11e · Other revenue, total

    $6,874

Functional expenses

Part IX, the statement of functional expenses.

  • 5 · Compensation of officers, directors and key employees

    total $484,781 · program services $266,347 · management and general $194,195 · fundraising $24,239

  • 7 · Other salaries and wages

    total $1,260,360 · program services $881,021 · management and general $355,625 · fundraising $23,714

  • 8 · Pension plan contributions

    total $52,719 · program services $37,042 · management and general $14,228 · fundraising $1,449

  • 9 · Other employee benefits

    total $171,617 · program services $120,584 · management and general $46,317 · fundraising $4,716

  • 10 · Payroll taxes

    total $136,244 · program services $91,528 · management and general $41,137 · fundraising $3,579

  • 11b · Fees: legal

    total $3,132 · management and general $3,132

  • 11c · Fees: accounting

    total $29,944 · management and general $29,944

  • 11d · Fees: lobbying

    total $73,250 · program services $73,250

  • 11f · Fees: investment management

    total $5,476 · management and general $5,476

  • 11g · Fees: other

    total $1,333,909 · program services $1,249,396 · management and general $84,513

  • 13 · Office expenses

    total $77,485 · program services $33,629 · management and general $41,552 · fundraising $2,304

  • 14 · Information technology

    total $148,360 · program services $103,095 · management and general $40,039 · fundraising $5,226

  • 16 · Occupancy

    total $194,737 · program services $136,403 · management and general $48,650 · fundraising $9,684

  • 17 · Travel

    total $58,947 · program services $52,607 · management and general $6,157 · fundraising $183

  • 19 · Conferences, conventions and meetings

    total $33,160 · program services $29,593 · management and general $3,463 · fundraising $104

  • 22 · Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    total $46,611 · management and general $46,611

  • 23 · Insurance

    total $11,663 · management and general $11,663

  • 24a · Other expenses: PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS

    total $41,669 · program services $41,669

  • 24b · Other expenses: DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS

    total $11,630 · program services $8,733 · management and general $2,278 · fundraising $619

  • 24c · Other expenses: TAXES AND LICENSES

    total $520 · management and general $520

Balance sheet

Part X, book values.

  • 2 · Savings and temporary cash investments

    beginning of year $6,664,732 · end of year $5,889,246

  • 3 · Pledges and grants receivable

    beginning of year $5,409,619 · end of year $2,809,973

  • 9 · Prepaid expenses and deferred charges

    beginning of year $62,924 · end of year $128,641

  • 10a · Land, buildings and equipment: cost or other basis

    $163,964

  • 10b · Land, buildings and equipment: accumulated depreciation

    $101,062

  • 10c · Land, buildings and equipment, net

    beginning of year $111,290 · end of year $62,902

  • 12 · Investments: other securities

    end of year $3,559,671

  • 15 · Other assets

    beginning of year $16,170 · end of year $297,019

  • 17 · Accounts payable and accrued expenses

    beginning of year $206,472 · end of year $308,778

  • 25 · Other liabilities

    beginning of year $56,415 · end of year $289,417

  • 27 · Net assets without donor restrictions

    beginning of year $4,588,618 · end of year $5,550,757

  • 28 · Net assets with donor restrictions

    beginning of year $7,413,230 · end of year $6,598,500

Mission and programs · 2022

Mission

THE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY IS COMMITTED TO IMPROVING COLLEGE ACCESS AND SUCCESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION FOR ALL STUDENTS - WITH A FOCUS ON STUDENTS OF COLOR, STUDENTS FROM LOW-INCOME BACKGROUNDS, AND OTHER HISTORICALLY MARGINALIZED POPULATIONS - BY PROVIDING TIMELY RESEARCH TO INFORM PUBLIC POLICY DECISIONS.

Activities or mission (Part I)

SEE PART III, LINE 1.

  • BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION ADVOCATING FOR TIMELY, ACCESSIBLE, AND COMPLETE POSTSECONDARY DATA FOR STUDENTS, POLICYMAKERS, AND POSTSECONDARY INSTITUTIONSTHE UNITED STATES' POSTSECONDARY SYSTEM IS DATA-RICH BUT INFORMATION-POOR. RECOGNIZING THE POWER OF HIGH-QUALITY DATA AND THE NEED FOR TIMELY, ACCESSIBLE, AND COMPLETE INFORMATION TO ENSURE EQUITABLE ACCESS AND SUCCESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION ALL WHILE RIGOROUSLY PROTECTING INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY IHEP LEADS A COALITION OF DIVERSE ORGANIZATIONS CALLED THE POSTSECONDARY DATA COLLABORATIVE. KNOWN SIMPLY AS "POSTSECDATA," THE COALITION CONVENES REGULARLY TO IDENTIFY ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE DATA THAT GUIDES STUDENTS AND FAMILIES IN MAKING COLLEGE CHOICES, INFORMS FEDERAL, STATE, AND INSTITUTIONAL POLICIES, AND SUPPORTS COLLEGE ADMINISTRATORS AND FACULTY. THROUGH IMPACTFUL RESEARCH, TARGETED ADVOCACY EFFORTS, AND ENGAGEMENT WITH POLICYMAKERS, INSTITUTIONS, AND OTHER KEY PARTNERS, POSTSECDATA IS IMPROVING FEDERAL DATA COLLECTIONS, STRENGTHENING STATE DATA SYSTEMS, AND BUILDING A FOUNDATION FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS OF STUDENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES TO MAKE FULLY INFORMED DECISIONS ABOUT THEIR INVESTMENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION.

    Expenses $1,309,041 · Revenue $55,000

  • PROMOTING CLEAR TRANSFER PATHWAYS FOR EVERY 100 STUDENTS WHO ENROLL IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES, 31 STUDENTS TRANSFER TO A FOUR-YEAR INSTITUTION. OF THOSE, ONLY 14 COMPLETE A BACHELOR'S DEGREE WITHIN SIX YEARS. TOO MANY STUDENTS ARE DERAILED FROM THEIR HIGHER EDUCATION GOALS BY UNEXPECTED, UNAFFORDABLE, AND UNTENABLEYET SOLVABLECHALLENGES ALONG THEIR TRANSFER JOURNEY. RECOGNIZING THE NEED FOR CLEAR SUPPORTS AND EQUITABLE PATHWAYS TO COMPLETE A DEGREE ACROSS MULTIPLE INSTITUTIONS, IHEP LED TRANSFERBOOST, (BACHELOR'S OPPORTUNITY OPTIONS THAT ARE STRAIGHTFORWARD AND TRANSPARENT), AN INITIATIVE FUNDED BY ECMC FOUNDATION TO ENSURE TRANSFER POLICY AND PRACTICE MEET THE NEEDS OF TODAY'S STUDENTS, TO ELEVATE TRANSFER COMMITMENTS, AND TO REACH STUDENTS WITH SIMPLE, CLEAR MESSAGING ABOUT AFFORDABLE TRANSFER PATHWAYS. BEGINNING IN 2021, TWENTY-FOUR POSTSECONDARY INSTITUTIONS IN ARIZONA, ILLINOIS AND VIRGINIA JOINED TRANSFERBOOST TO ADDRESS CHALLENGES WITH TRANSFER STUDENT RECRUITMENT AND PATHWAYS TO DEGREE COMPLETION. INSTITUTIONS WITHIN EACH STATE PARTNERED TO BETTER REACH STUDENTS WITH SIMPLE, CLEAR MESSAGING ABOUT AFFORDABLE TRANSFER PATHWAYS. THEY ANALYZED THE RETURN ON INVESTMENT OF IMPROVING AFFORDABILITY FOR TRANSFER STUDENTS, AND EXAMINED TRANSFER POLICIES AND PRACTICES TO ENSURE THEY MEET THE NEEDS OF TODAY'S STUDENTS, MOST OF WHOM WORK FULL- OR PART-TIME, AND MANY ALSO BALANCE THEIR STUDIES WITH CARING FOR CHILDREN OR OTHER LOVED ONES. THE FULL RECOMMENDATIONS ARE OUTLINED IN THREE BRIEFS THAT WERE PUBLISHED IN APRIL 2023

    Expenses $694,304

  • ACCELERATE STUDENT SUCCESS PLANNINGTO SUPPORT GRANTEE INSTITUTIONS IN THE "ACCELERATE STUDENT SUCCESS PLANNING GRANT" OPPORTUNITY, THE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY (IHEP) DEVELOPED A TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE STRUCTURE TO ENSURE THAT INSTITUTIONS HAD ACCESS TO SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS AND RESEARCH AS THEY DEVELOPED ACTION PLANS TO CREATE OR ENHANCE PROGRAMS THAT ADVANCE STUDENT SUCCESS. FUNDED BY A CONTRACT FROM THE TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD THIS APPROACH SUPPORTED CAPACITY-BUILDING THROUGH A STATEWIDE COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE, CONNECTIONS TO COACHES WITH EXPERTISE IN THEIR TOPIC AREA, AND WORKSHOPS THAT BUILT A SOLID EVIDENCE-BASE FOR ACTION PLANS. AS A RESULT OF IHEP'S COACHING, REGULAR COMMUNICATION, AND PROJECT FACILITATION OF THIS PLANNING PHASE, 69 INSTITUTIONS SUBMITTED ACTION PLANS TO THE COORDINATING BOARD AFTER BEING REVIEWED BY COACHES. THE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COORDINATED BY IHEP IN THE PLANNING PHASE OF THE "ACCELERATING STUDENT SUCCESS" GRANT OPPORTUNITY CREATED A SOLID FOUNDATION FOR THESE GRANTEES TO DEVELOP OR EXPAND PROGRAMMING THAT WILL POSITIVELY IMPACT STUDENTS' LIVES.

    Expenses $340,360

  • REENGAGING RETURNING ADULT STUDENTS AND AWARDING EARNED DEGREES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES, 39 MILLION ADULTS HAVE COMPLETED SOME COLLEGE, BUT STOPPED OUT BEFORE EARNING A DEGREE. IN MANY CASES, STUDENTS ARE LEFT WITH DEBT BUT WITHOUT THE ECONOMIC AND NON-ECONOMIC BENEFITS A CREDENTIAL SHOULD PROVIDE. TO IDENTIFY, REENGAGE, AND SUPPORT THESE STUDENTS, IHEP'S DEGREES WHEN DUE (DWD) INITIATIVE ENGAGED NEARLY 200 INSTITUTIONS BOTH TWO- AND FOUR-YEARS IN 23 STATES. OVER THE COURSE OF THREE COHORTS, IHEP HAS BUILT INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY TO AWARD DEGREES TO STUDENTS WHO HAVE EARNED THEM, REENGAGE FORMER STUDENTS WHO HAVE STOPPED OUT, AND EQUIP STUDENTS WITH DEGREES THAT HELP THEM GET AHEAD IN TODAY'S WORKFORCE. THIS YEAR'S EFFORT WAS FUNDED BY ASCENDIUM AND KRESGE AND ECMC FOUNDATIONS.

    Expenses $320,308

  • EVALUATION-SET ASIDE RESEARCH IHEP HAS A HISTORY OF ADVANCING STUDENT-FOCUSED, DATA-INFORMED, AND EQUITY-DRIVEN POLICY SOLUTIONS AND MOBILIZING THE FIELD OF HIGHER EDUCATION AROUND THEM. OUR WORK SPURS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH, SPARKS TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE, ENGAGES DEDICATED EXPERTS AND IMPACTED COMMUNITIES, AND DEVELOPS POLICY SOLUTIONS THAT FURTHER RACIAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC EQUITY. BEGINNING IN 2022, IHEP PARTNERED WITH RESULTS FOR AMERICA (RFA) TO DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (ED) FOR IMPLEMENTING THE EVALUATION SET-ASIDE AUTHORITY GRANTED TO THE U.S. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION IN THE FY22 OMNIBUS APPROPRIATIONS PACKAGE THAT BECAME LAW IN MARCH 2022. IHEP WORKED WITH RFA TO: INVESTIGATE PRIOR EVALUATIONS AND FRAMEWORKS THAT FOCUS ON EQUITABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE FIELD'S NEEDS REGARDING RIGOROUS RESEARCH AND EVALUATIONS AND INFORM OUR RECOMMENDATIONS; CONVENE LEADING EXPERTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY TO BUILD CONSENSUS AROUND A SET OF EQUITY-FOCUSED RECOMMENDATIONS TO INFORM ED'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SET-ASIDE AUTHORITY; AND DISTILL INSIGHTS GAINED THROUGH THE FIRST TWO PHASES INTO A SET OF FIVE EQUITY-FOCUSED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DECISION-MAKERS AT ED. DRAWING ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS, IHEP ORGANIZED A RESPONSE TO ED'S RELATED REQUEST FOR INFORMATION THAT WAS CO-SIGNED BY 37 OTHER ORGANIZATIONS. IT OFFERS THREE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HOW TO BEST LEVERAGE THIS AUTHORITY TO IMPROVE POSTSECONDARY OUTCOMES FOR ALL STUDENTS, WITH A PARTICULAR FOCUS ON STUDENTS OF COLOR AND STUDENTS FROM LOW-INCOME BACKGROUNDS. RESOURCES FROM ECMC FOUNDATION, COUPLED WITH SUPPORT FROM ASCENDIUM, ENABLED IHEP TO FILL A CRITICAL AND TIME-SENSITIVE FIELD NEED TO LEVERAGE A NEW FEDERAL FUNDING STREAM FOR INVESTING IN BUILDING THE EVIDENCE BASE ON WHAT WORKS IN HIGHER EDUCATION, FOR WHOM, AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES.

    Expenses $235,167

  • ACTION NOW INITIATIVE (ANI) GENEROUS SUPPORT FROM ANI HAS HELPED IHEP ADVOCATE FOR FEDERAL POLICIES THAT WOULD IMPROVE DATA QUALITY AND TRANSPARENCY ABOUT STUDENT OUTCOMES, ESPECIALLY THROUGH PASSAGE OF THE COLLEGE TRANSPARENCY ACT (CTA). MOMENTUM AROUND THE COLLEGE TRANSPARENCY ACT HAS GROWN IN RECENT YEARS AS MORE AND MORE POLICYMAKERS VOICE SUPPORT FOR THIS COMMONSENSE SOLUTION. DURING THE 116TH CONGRESS, CTA GARNERED BIPARTISAN SUPPORT FROM 36 SENATORS AND 234 REPRESENTATIVES, AND IN THE 117TH CONGRESS, CTA PASSED THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN AN AMENDMENT TO THE AMERICA COMPETES ACT OF 2022. CTA WAS RECENTLY REINTRODUCED IN THE 118TH CONGRESS WITH CONTINUED BIPARTISAN AND BICAMERAL SPONSORSHIP. THIS OVERWHELMING SUPPORT IS MATCHED OUTSIDE OF CONGRESS AS WELL. CTA HAS BEEN ENDORSED BY NEARLY 170 ORGANIZATIONS REPRESENTING HIGHER EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONS, RESEARCHERS, NON-PROFITS, CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS, AND THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY. ALONGSIDE THIS COALITION BUILDING, WE CONTINUE SUPPORTING OTHER DATA AND TRANSPARENCY EFFORTS, INCLUDING OFFERING RECOMMENDATIONS TO ENHANCE THE COLLEGE SCORECARD AND THE INTEGRATED POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION DATA SYSTEM, IMPROVE NET PRICE CALCULATORS, AND STANDARDIZE FINANCIAL AID AWARD LETTERS. ALONGSIDE OUR ADVOCACY FOR THE COLLEGE TRANSPARENCY ACT (CTA), IHEP ALSO PARTNERED WITH ORGANIZATIONS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND WHAT RESEARCH AND INPUT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (ED) AND NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS (NCES) WILL NEED TO DEVELOP A STUDENT LEVEL DATA NETWORK (SLDN) WHICH WOULD BE CREATED IF CTA WERE ENACTED. IN PARTNERSHIP WITH RTI INTERNATIONAL, IHEP ENGAGED A DIVERSE ARRAY OF STAKEHOLDERS AND USED THESE INSIGHTS TO INFORM HOW NCES SHOULD DESIGN AND STRUCTURE GOVERNANCE, TECHNOLOGY AND DATA DEFINITIONS FOR A FEDERAL SLDN.

    Expenses $207,103

  • RACIAL WEALTH GAP STUDY WITHIN HIGHER EDUCATION, WE OFTEN EXAMINE INEQUITIES BY INCOME, BUT RARELY BY WEALTH. TWO FAMILIES WITH IDENTICAL INCOMES, BUT DIFFERENT LEVELS OF WEALTH ENTER HIGHER EDUCATION WITH VERY DIFFERENT OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS. BUT WEALTH IS NOT OFTEN INCORPORATED INTO POLICY MECHANISMS BECAUSE IT IS DIFFICULT TO MEASURE, AND THE FIELD OF HIGHER EDUCATION HAS NOT REACHED CONSENSUS ABOUT AN APPROPRIATE AND PRACTICAL WAY TO CAPTURE THIS COMPLEX OUTCOME. WITH FUNDING AND SUPPORT FROM THE JOYCE FOUNDATION, IHEP IS ANALYZING EXISTING DATA TO ANSWER POLICY RESEARCH QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RACE, WEALTH, AND POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION NATIONALLY AND FOR THE GREAT LAKES REGION. THOSE RESEARCH-DRIVEN INSIGHTS CAN SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATE AND FEDERAL POLICY SOLUTIONS FOR ADDRESSING INEQUITIES IN OUR CURRENT HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM. ADDITIONALLY, IHEP IS ALSO DEVELOPING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DATA IMPROVEMENTS THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR MORE NUANCED MEASUREMENTS AND ANALYSIS IN THE FUTURE.

    Expenses $11,947

  • LEADING THE EQUITABLE VALUE MOVEMENT POSTSECONDARY INSTITUTIONS HAVE THE POWER TO DELIVER VALUABLE OPPORTUNITIES TO STUDENTS, DRIVE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL MOBILITY, BOOST COMMUNITIES, BUILD A STRONGER WORKFORCE, AND BENEFIT OUR COUNTRY. STUDENTS WHO COMPLETE CREDENTIALS ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE EMPLOYED, EARN HIGHER WAGES, HAVE GREATER ACCESS TO RETIREMENT AND HEALTHCARE PLANS, HAVE BETTER PHYSICAL HEALTH, AND ENGAGE IN MORE CIVIC-MINDED BEHAVIORS WHEN COMPARED WITH THOSE WHO DID NOT COMPLETE A CREDENTIAL. UNFORTUNATELY, THESE TRANSFORMATIONAL CREDENTIALS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED RETURNS ARE NOT DISTRIBUTED EQUITABLY; INSTITUTIONS ARE NOT DELIVERING THE VALUE THEY COULD AND SHOULD TO MANY POPULATIONS, INCLUDING BLACK, HISPANIC AND/OR LATINX, INDIGENOUS, UNDERREPRESENTED ASIAN AMERICAN, NATIVE HAWAIIAN, AND PACIFIC ISLANDER (AANHPI) STUDENTS, STUDENTS FROM LOW-INCOME BACKGROUNDS, AND WOMEN. AS MANAGING PARTNER OF THE POSTSECONDARY VALUE COMMISSION, A ROLE FOR WHICH IHEP WAS SELECTED IN 2019 BY THE FUNDER, THE BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION, IHEP OVERSAW THE COMMISSION'S RESEARCH AND CONVENINGS. IN 2021, IHEP RELEASED THE COMMISSION'S FINDINGS, INCLUDING A VALUE DEFINITION, MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK, ACTION AGENDA, AND FOUNDATIONAL RESEARCH. IN ADDITION, IHEP DEVELOPED AN ONLINE, INTERACTIVE TOOL (EQUITABLE VALUE EXPLORER) TO PUT THE POWER OF THE FRAMEWORK INTO THE HANDS OF MEDIA, RESEARCHERS, AND POLICYMAKERS AT EVERY LEVEL. IN 2022, IHEP LAUNCHED THE VALUE DATA COLLABORATIVE TO IMPLEMENT THE FRAMEWORK IN SELECTED STATES ACROSS THE COUNTRY AND RELEASED A CASE STUDY FEATURING NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY'S STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING EQUITABLE VALUE. ONGOING DEVELOPMENTS INCLUDE THE CONTINUED MANAGEMENT OF THE VALUE DATA COLLABORATIVE, AND COLLABORATION WITH KEY PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS ALSO WORKING TO CATALYZE THE EQUITABLE VALUE MOVEMENT

    Expenses $6,667

As filed on the 2022 return. The filer continues this part on Schedule O, which is not shown here.

Listed in Part VII

  • Peter O Nwosu

    SECRETARY, THEN CHAIR (START 12/8/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Maryellen McGuire

    VICE CHAIR (START 12/8/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Ajita Talwalker Menon

    SECRETARY (START 12/8/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Jacob Fraire

    CHAIR THRU 12/8/22, THEN BD MEMBER

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Kristin Hultquist

    VICE CHAIR (THRU 12/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Michelle R Weise

    BOARD MEMBER

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Laura Cronin

    BOARD MEMBER

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Denisa Gandara

    BOARD MEMBER (START 12/8/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Michael T Krause

    BOARD MEMBER (START 12/8/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • James Larimore

    BOARD MEMBER (START 12/8/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Robert L Olcott

    BOARD MEMBER (START 12/8/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Amanda R Tachine

    BOARD MEMBER (START 12/8/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Stella M Flores

    BOARD MEMBER (THRU 12/8/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Cheryl A Oldham

    BOARD MEMBER (THRU 12/8/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • James L Moore III

    BOARD MEMBER (THRU 9/22)

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1
  • Mary Mamie G Voight

    PRESIDENT & CEO

    Total calculated
    $313,350
    From this org
    $276,723
    From related orgs
    $0
    Other
    $36,627
    Hours/week
    40

    Schedule J breakdown matched by us

    Base
    $250,723
    Bonus
    $26,000
    Other
    $0
    Deferred
    $11,651
    Nontaxable benefits
    $24,976
    Filer's total
    $313,350
  • Tola Fadeyi

    DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/TREASURER

    Total calculated
    $171,432
    From this org
    $145,005
    From related orgs
    $0
    Other
    $26,427
    Hours/week
    40

    Schedule J breakdown matched by us

    Base
    $145,005
    Bonus
    $0
    Other
    $0
    Deferred
    $6,697
    Nontaxable benefits
    $19,730
    Filer's total
    $171,432
  • Piper Hendricks

    VP COMMS & EXT AFFAIRS (END 12/22)

    Total calculated
    $162,938
    From this org
    $146,321
    From related orgs
    $0
    Other
    $16,617
    Hours/week
    40

    Schedule J breakdown matched by us

    Base
    $146,321
    Bonus
    $0
    Other
    $0
    Deferred
    $5,768
    Nontaxable benefits
    $10,849
    Filer's total
    $162,938
  • Amanda Janice Roberson

    DIR OF RES & POL/S.DIR OF SEPO

    Total calculated
    $150,576
    From this org
    $120,516
    From related orgs
    $0
    Other
    $30,060
    Hours/week
    40

    Schedule J breakdown matched by us

    Base
    $115,516
    Bonus
    $5,000
    Other
    $0
    Deferred
    $5,373
    Nontaxable benefits
    $24,687
    Filer's total
    $150,576
  • Kimberly B Dancy

    ASSOC. DIRECTOR OF POL AND RES

    Total calculated
    $119,682
    From this org
    $106,100
    From related orgs
    $0
    Other
    $13,582
    Hours/week
    40

Compensation is as filed in Part VII: reportable pay from this organization and from related organizations, other compensation, and hours per week. The total, marked calculated, is our sum of the three dollar columns, with a blank column counted as $0; the form itself has no total. On a Form 990-EZ the columns are Part IV's instead, and on a Form 990-PF Part VIII's — compensation, contributions to benefit plans, and expense account — and the total sums those. A Schedule J breakdown is as filed: base pay, bonus, other, deferred compensation and nontaxable benefits from this organization, with any from related organizations beside each, and the filer's own total. It is shown with the Part VII listing of the same name on the same return. The form gives no key between the two, so that pairing is ours, and is marked matched by us.

Schedule J

Answered yes

  • 3 · Compensation committee
  • 3 · Form 990 of other organizations
  • 3 · Approval by the board or compensation committee
  • 7 · Other non-fixed payments

Answered no

  • 4a · Severance or change-of-control payment
  • 4b · Supplemental nonqualified retirement plan
  • 4c · Equity-based compensation arrangement
  • 5a · Pay contingent on this organization's revenues
  • 5b · Pay contingent on a related organization's revenues
  • 6a · Pay contingent on this organization's net earnings
  • 6b · Pay contingent on a related organization's net earnings
  • 8 · Paid under the initial-contract exception

The filer's explanations (Part III)

PART I, LINE 7
THE FOLLOWING BONUSES WERE PAID TO INDIVIUDALS LISTED ON PART VII: MARY (MAMIE) G. VOIGHT $26,000 AMANDA JANICE ROBERSON $5,000

Part I's answers as filed. A line not listed was left unanswered; on lines 1a and 3 that means the box was not checked.

Grants on this return

No itemized grants to organizations on this return.

Provenance

Return type
form_990
Tax year
2022
Filed
19 October 2023
IRS schema version
2022v5.0
Source object
202322929349301862

Check it against the return as filed: the GivingTuesday Data Lake hosts a public copy of the original XML.

The source document this was parsed from is served over the API, which is where bulk and document access live.