Skip to content
Nonprofiteer
← All organizations

AKASHINGA INC

EIN 32-0408734 SOUTHFIELD, MI

Browse the largest nonprofits in Michigan

Revenue 2025
$4,220,471
Expenses 2025
$9,782,373

Program services were 83.2% of total expenses calculated — Part IX's program-services column over total expenses, both as filed.

As filed

Subsection
03
NTEE code
D31
Classification
1240
Street
29476 NORTHWESTERN HWY 531

These codes are the IRS's own and are shown exactly as filed. What each one means is in the Business Master File documentation (opens in a new tab).

Mission and programs · 2025

Mission

DELIVER ECOLOGICAL STABILITY AND LONG-TERM PROTECTION OF LARGE-SCALE WILDERNESS BY SUPPORTING AND EMPOWERING LOCAL COMMUNITIES.

  • AKASHINGA DELIVERS RESILIENT NATURE CONSERVATION PROGRAMMES OF GLOBAL SIGNIFICANCE THROUGH COMMUNITY-DRIVEN PARTNERSHIPS. OUR MISSION IS GROUNDED IN A PRINCIPLE AS SIMPLE AS IT IS CONSEQUENTIAL: WHEN COMMUNITIES, AND SPECIFICALLY WOMEN IN LOCAL COMMUNITIES, ARE GIVEN GENUINE AUTHORITY OVER THE ECOSYSTEMS THEY DEPEND ON, THEY PROTECT THEM. NOT BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD TO, BUT BECAUSE THEY HAVE A REAL STAKE IN THE OUTCOME.BIODIVERSITY LOSS, CLIMATE CHANGE, AND THE EROSION OF HUMAN WELLBEING ARE NOT PARALLEL CRISES; THEY ARE THE SAME CRISIS, COMPOUNDING EACH OTHER ACROSS GENERATIONS. AFRICA'S WILDLIFE CORRIDORS FACE CONVERGING PRESSURES: POACHING DRIVEN BY CRIME, POVERTY, AND EXCLUSION; HABITAT LOSS FROM AGRICULTURAL ENCROACHMENT; AND HUMAN-WILDLIFE CONFLICT THAT PITS COMMUNITIES AGAINST THE ECOSYSTEMS THEY DEPEND ON. ADDRESSING ANY ONE OF THESE IN ISOLATION IS INSUFFICIENT. ADDRESSING ALL THREE TOGETHER - THROUGH THE PEOPLE MOST AFFECTED AND MOST INVESTED - IS THE ONLY APPROACH WITH A REALISTIC CHANCE OF LASTING.CONSERVATION HAS HISTORICALLY BEEN DESIGNED FOR ECOSYSTEMS, NOT WITH COMMUNITIES. EXTERNAL ACTORS ARRIVE, IMPOSE RULES, AND LEAVE. CONSERVATION GAINS ARE OFTEN DIFFICULT TO SUSTAIN WHERE LOCAL OWNERSHIP AND LONG-TERM COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP ARE ABSENT. WILDLIFE RECOVERS TEMPORARILY AND DECLINES AGAIN WHEN THE FUNDING ENDS. WOMEN, WHO MAKE UP THE MAJORITY OF RURAL AFRICAN COMMUNITIES CLOSEST TO PROTECTED AREA, HAVE BEEN LARGELY ABSENT FROM FRONTLINE CONSERVATION LEADERSHIP. IN AN INDUSTRY WHERE WOMEN ARE OUTNUMBERED BY MEN 100 TO 1 AT AN OPERATIONAL LEVEL, THAT IS NOT A SMALL OVERSIGHT. IT IS A FUNDAMENTAL MISUNDERSTANDING OF WHO CONSERVATION IS FOR AND WHO IT MUST BE LED BY.AKASHINGA WAS ESTABLISHED TO MEET THIS CHALLENGE: PLACING WOMEN AND COMMUNITIES NOT AT THE MARGINS OF CONSERVATION LEADERSHIP, BUT AT ITS CENTRE, IN AUTHENTIC ROLES WITH REAL AUTHORITY AND LONG-TERM STAKE. OUR MODEL COMBINES WOMEN-LED FRONTLINE OPERATIONS, INTELLIGENCE-LED ENFORCEMENT, COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP, ACCESS TO HEALTH AND LIVELIHOOD SUPPORT, AND RIGOROUS ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE INTO A SINGLE INTEGRATED SYSTEM. EACH ELEMENT REINFORCES THE OTHERS. NONE WORKS WITHOUT THE OTHERS. TODAY, AKASHINGA OPERATES ACROSS 13.1 MILLION ACRES IN ZIMBABWE, MOZAMBIQUE, BOTSWANA, AND NAMIBIA. OUR WORKFORCE IS 98% LOCAL AND/OR INDIGENOUS IN THE COUNTRIES WHERE WE OPERATE, WITH 63% OF OUR WORKFORCE BEING WOMEN.AKASHINGA CONTRIBUTES TO THE FOLLOWING GLOBAL CONSERVATION STRATEGIES AT THE LANDSCAPE LEVEL: 15 OF 17 UN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS, THE GLOBAL 30X30 CHALLENGE, THE PROTECTING OUR PLANET CHALLENGE, AND AGENDA 2063 OF THE AFRICAN UNION.

    Expenses $7,553,528 · Grants $6,894,921

  • LEAD RANGERAKASHINGA'S PARTNERSHIP WITH THE LEAD RANGER PROGRAMME - OPERATING UNDER THE NAME LEAD CONSERVATION, AND KNOWN PREVIOUSLY AS RANGER CAMPUS - STRENGTHENS THE CAPACITY OF CONSERVATION ORGANISATIONS TO PROTECT NATURE THROUGH TRAINING, COACHING, AND MENTORING IN FIELD OPERATIONS, STRATEGIC PROBLEM SOLVING, AND THE LEADERSHIP SKILLS PROACTIVE WILDLIFE PROTECTION REQUIRES. DELIVERED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE THIN GREEN LINE FOUNDATION, THE PROGRAMME EXTENDED MENTORSHIP BEYOND AKASHINGA'S OWN RANGER TEAMS TO A GROWING NETWORK OF PARTNER ORGANISATIONS ACROSS EAST AND SOUTHERN AFRICA.THROUGH THE FIRST HALF OF 2025, THE PROGRAMME DELIVERED SIX TRAINING COURSES AND MENTORSHIPS, TOTALLING 1,770 HOURS OF INSTRUCTION TO 84 LEARNERS, 32 OF THEM WOMEN, ACROSS COHORTS INCLUDING THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN WILDLIFE COLLEGE, WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY INDIA, CHEWORE CONSERVATION TRUST AND VICTORIA FALLS ANTI-POACHING UNIT, AND PARTNER ORGANISATIONS IN KENYA AND INDONESIA. CURRICULUM SPANNED FIELD PROBLEM SOLVING, GIS-BASED MAPPING, AND OPERATIONAL READINESS. POST-TRAINING EVALUATIONS FOUND LEARNERS APPLYING NEW SKILLS DIRECTLY IN THE FIELD, INCLUDING LIFE-SAVING FIRST AID ADMINISTERED DURING REAL OPERATIONAL INCIDENTS.IN MID-2025, THE PROGRAMME WAS FORMALLY ESTABLISHED AS ITS OWN INDEPENDENT ENTITY. THIS TRANSITION MARKED THE PROGRAMME'S EVOLUTION FROM AN AKASHINGA-PARTNERED INITIATIVE INTO A FREESTANDING ORGANISATION CARRYING ITS TRAINING MODEL FORWARD INDEPENDENTLY.

    Expenses $280,758 · Grants $226,887

  • EDUCATION AND OUTREACHWHILE FOCUSED PRIMARILY ON FIELD WORK AND ON THE GROUND RESULTS, WE ALSO SEEK TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE IMPORTANT ISSUES OF CONSERVATION, WILDLIFE PROTECTION, AND ITS CLIMATE IMPLICATIONS, AS PUBLIC OPINION AND PRESSURE PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN BRINGING AN END TO POACHING AND PROTECTING NATURE. THE UNIQUENESS AND SUCCESS OF AKASHINGA GENERATES EMPATHY AND MEDIA INTEREST.IN 2025, AKASHINGA'S EDUCATION AND OUTREACH EFFORTS SPANNED A BROAD RANGE OF CHANNELS - INCLUDING THE ORGANISATION'S WEBSITE, SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS, MEDIA COVERAGE, NEWSLETTERS, AND PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS CAMPAIGNS - TO RAISE AWARENESS OF CONSERVATION ISSUES AND BUILD SUPPORT AMONG DONORS, PARTNERS, AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN THE UNITED STATES AND INTERNATIONALLY. AKASHINGA'S DIGITAL PRESENCE CONTINUED TO GROW, WITH SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT REACHING NEW AUDIENCES ACROSS MULTIPLE PLATFORMS AND WEBSITE TRAFFIC DRIVEN BY A COMBINATION OF ORGANIC SEARCH, NEWS COVERAGE, AND DONOR COMMUNICATIONS. THE BRAND & MARKETING TEAM PRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED CONTENT HIGHLIGHTING RANGER STORIES, ECOLOGICAL MILESTONES, AND COMMUNITY IMPACT, POSITIONING AKASHINGA'S MODEL AS A COMPELLING ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL CONSERVATION APPROACHES. MEDIA COVERAGE, PODCAST APPEARANCES, AND SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS BY ORGANISATIONAL LEADERSHIP EXTENDED PUBLIC REACH AND REINFORCED AKASHINGA'S CREDIBILITY WITH CONSERVATION AND PHILANTHROPY AUDIENCES. THESE OUTREACH EFFORTS ARE INTEGRAL TO AKASHINGA'S REVENUE GENERATION STRATEGY, INFORMING AND CULTIVATING THE DONOR BASE THAT SUSTAINS PROGRAMME DELIVERY ACROSS ALL FOUR COUNTRIES.

    Expenses $236,436

  • ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION UNIT (EPU)DUE TO THE SENSITIVE NATURE OF THIS WORK, THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION UNIT (EPU) IS A LESS-PUBLICIZED PROGRAMME. ITS FOCUS IS COUNTERING ILLEGAL WILDLIFE TRADE THROUGH COUNTER-TRAFFICKING INVESTIGATIONS, EARLY WARNING, AND INCIDENT RESPONSE. WORKING WITH NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT PARTNERS, STATE AUTHORITIES, AND PRIVATE AND NGO STAKEHOLDERS ACROSS ZIMBABWE AND MOZAMBIQUE, THE EPU MAINTAINS SUSTAINED PRESSURE ON ILLEGAL NETWORKS TO IDENTIFY, DISRUPT, AND PROSECUTE ORGANISED WILDLIFE CRIME.

    Expenses $66,881 · Grants $41,783

As filed on the 2025 return. The filer continues this part on Schedule O, which is not shown here.

Officers and directors · 2025

As listed in Part VII of the 2025 return, in the order the filer printed them. Each return names its own; this is not a roster the organization keeps with us.

  • Damien Mander

    PRESIDENT

    Total calculated
    $145,710
    From this org
    $145,710
    From related orgs
    $0
    Other
    $0
    Hours/week
    40
  • Kristin Brooks Titus

    SECRETARY

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1.5
  • Michelle Nevin

    DIRECTOR

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1.5
  • Melody Westen

    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

    Total calculated
    $16,322
    From this org
    $15,656
    From related orgs
    $0
    Other
    $666
    Hours/week
    40
  • Elizabeth Atherton

    BOARD CHAIR

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    10
  • Sarah Bolka

    TREASURER

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1.5
  • Neilesh Shelat

    DIRECTOR

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1.5
  • Ashley Sogge

    DIRECTOR

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1.5
  • Dr Stacy Crevello

    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

    Total calculated
    $7,308
    From this org
    $7,308
    From related orgs
    $0
    Other
    $0
    Hours/week
    60
  • Ian MacKenzie-Ross

    TREASURER & SECRETARY

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1.5
  • Kevin Tang

    DIRECTOR

    Total calculated
    $0
    Hours/week
    1.5
  • Gwen Franklin

    DIRECTOR OF OF STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT

    Total calculated
    $150,951
    From this org
    $150,951
    From related orgs
    $0
    Other
    $0
    Hours/week
    60

    Schedule J breakdown matched by us

    Base
    $150,951
    Bonus
    $0
    Other
    $0
    Deferred
    $0
    Nontaxable benefits
    $0
    Filer's total
    $150,951
  • Erin Mullikin

    SENIOR DIRECTOR OF BRAND & MARKETING

    Total calculated
    $148,496
    From this org
    $148,496
    From related orgs
    $0
    Other
    $0
    Hours/week
    60

Compensation is as filed in Part VII: reportable pay from this organization and from related organizations, other compensation, and hours per week. The total, marked calculated, is our sum of the three dollar columns, with a blank column counted as $0; the form itself has no total. On a Form 990-EZ the columns are Part IV's instead, and on a Form 990-PF Part VIII's — compensation, contributions to benefit plans, and expense account — and the total sums those. A Schedule J breakdown is as filed: base pay, bonus, other, deferred compensation and nontaxable benefits from this organization, with any from related organizations beside each, and the filer's own total. It is shown with the Part VII listing of the same name on the same return. The form gives no key between the two, so that pairing is ours, and is marked matched by us. Earlier years are each on their own filing page.

Filings

  • 2025
    Revenue
    $4,220,471
    Expenses
    $9,782,373
    Contributions
    $4,129,461
    Grants paid
    $7,163,591
  • 2023
    Revenue
    $13,503,750
    Expenses
    $7,555,245
    Contributions
    $13,455,036
    Grants paid
    $5,874,855
  • 2022
    Revenue
    $5,328,139
    Expenses
    $6,659,527
    Contributions
    $5,167,655
    Grants paid
    $2,872,414
  • 2022
    Revenue
    $5,328,139
    Expenses
    $6,659,527
    Contributions
    $5,167,655
    Grants paid
    $2,872,414

The four totals the IRS asks for on Part I of the Form 990, as filed. A dash means the figure was not present on the return — not that it was zero.

Other returns filed

  • 2021 · 990

    Revenue
    $7,403,147
    Expenses
    $3,168,109
    Assets (EOY)
    $4,935,040
  • 2020 · 990

    Revenue
    $2,356,602
    Expenses
    $2,393,191
    Assets (EOY)
    $722,953
  • 2019 · 990

    Revenue
    $1,915,853
    Expenses
    $1,510,564
    Assets (EOY)
    $897,662
  • 2019 · 990

    Revenue
    $1,942,935
    Expenses
    $1,717,969
    Assets (EOY)
    $790,378
  • 2018 · 990

    Revenue
    $1,082,252
    Expenses
    $906,067
    Assets (EOY)
    $509,746
  • 2018 · 990

    Revenue
    $1,082,252
    Expenses
    $906,067
    Assets (EOY)
    $509,746
  • 2017 · 990

    Revenue
    $901,898
    Expenses
    $538,231
    Assets (EOY)
    $648,667
  • 2017 · 990

    Revenue
    $729,460
    Expenses
    $693,449
    Assets (EOY)
    $323,292
  • 2016 · 990

    Revenue
    $781,402
    Expenses
    $774,925
    Assets (EOY)
    $474,933
  • 2016 · 990

    Revenue
    $587,602
    Expenses
    $777,421
    Assets (EOY)
    $278,637

Nonprofiteer parses Forms 990, 990-EZ and 990-PF, in a window of recent tax years. These returns are recorded from the IRS e-file index, so their figures were extracted by that index rather than read from the return here — treat them as a different source from the filings above, not as more of the same record. A dash means the index carries no figure; Form 990-T listings carry none at all. Showing the 10 most recent; the API carries the rest.

Grants made

No itemized grants to organizations. Schedule I is filed only by organizations that granted more than $5,000 to a recipient, so most filers have none.

Grants received

The 10 largest by cash amount. The API serves every itemized grant.

Other IRS files

Auto-Revocation List

Not listed. The IRS publishes this list for organizations whose exemption was automatically revoked for failing to file for three consecutive years.

Publication 78

Listed as of 13 October 2026, under deductibility PC.

These are two separate IRS files on two separate schedules, shown as published and not reconciled with each other. Neither is a statement about whether a contribution is deductible today: 19,245 organizations appear in Publication 78 while the IRS's own revocation file lists them as currently revoked, more than half of those revoked before 2019. Absence from Publication 78 is evidence of nothing, and presence is not evidence either. Verify current status with the IRS before relying on it.

What this page reflects

The registration facts above come from the IRS Business Master File published 9 November 2026 and read 9 November 2026, for every organization at once. Returns through tax year 2025, the newest we have parsed for this organization.